| Pakuto pakuto no mi | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:17 pm | |
| Name in Japanese (translation): pakuto pakuto no mi (Impact Impact fruit. Pakuto is a play off the romaji 'Inpakuto' for impact.) Capabilities: The user's body is capable of naturally absorbing any impact, leaving no mark or damage. The user can also store this impact and redistribute it as desired. They become a human impact dial. (note, things like fire, electricity and other non-impact damages are not negated by this fruit.) Type: Paramecia | |
|
| |
Layman Iconoclast Admin
Posts : 10667 Join date : 2008-07-01 Age : 32 Location : I am everywhere I see everything
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:54 pm | |
| look, a bullet is technically impact and even though a sword cuts it has impact when it makes contact, this will need a lot more explanation | |
|
| |
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:49 pm | |
| Sorry. I thought specifying the person was essentially a human impact dial would be sufficient. Since the forum clearly allows impact dials as a weapon, I felt the rules would be understood. And yes, as I said, those are impacts. The user is essentially immune to physical impact, much like most Logia class users are. The limitation is that non-impact damage, like heat, pressure <a bearhug for example, slow application of pressure..>, poison, electricity, suffocation, and so on, is effective. So a logia like Enel or Ace or Ao-kiji would be deadly, while someone like Mr.1, Buggy, and so on far less so. Even mr.3 could be pretty dangerous... if the user has no impact stored to break free of the suffocating wax... | |
|
| |
Layman Iconoclast Admin
Posts : 10667 Join date : 2008-07-01 Age : 32 Location : I am everywhere I see everything
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:58 pm | |
| that did not address my concern at all ((see my last post)) | |
|
| |
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:08 pm | |
| Well, I've seen sword strikes be absorbed by an impact dial, so yes.. sword strikes would not hurt the user. Bullets... same thing. Bullets especially. Bullets make more sence than swords to be absorbed. A punch.. a club strike.. an axe hit... stepping on a caltrop violently, technically running barefoot would allow the user to build up impact... albiet slowly.. to be precise... any.. physical... blow... If you strike the user with a sword, they could stop the blow with a bare hand, point at your chest... and hit you with all the impact of that sword strike, on a concentrated spot of their fingertip. You could shoot them.. the bullets would strike their body, fall to the ground, and they could pick one up, point to it with one hand, and 'shoot' it back by forcing the impact into the bullet. They could charge into a wall, and release a burst of impact from their shoulder on contact to break the wall down, and any falling debris would simply give them more 'impact'. Now.. lets say a ceiling falls on top of them. They would not be injured by falling debris, but if it left enough weight on top of them, they could be crushed after the impact, suffocate, so on. If you grasp their throat and squeeze slowly, you will choke them. If you grasp their head and violently twist it, you will break their neck. If you poison them, they will succumb totally to the effects of the poison. A contact poison coated weapon would work, one that requires an actual cut would not. If you struck them with a hot branding iron, they would feel no pain from the impact of the strike, but would from the searing heat of the iron. I really do not know how to explain it any better than this... I'm sorry. The person is essentially a living impact dial. | |
|
| |
Layman Iconoclast Admin
Posts : 10667 Join date : 2008-07-01 Age : 32 Location : I am everywhere I see everything
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:26 pm | |
| this seems very chaep what do you think Irrational? | |
|
| |
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:28 pm | |
| I don't intend to be argumentative or confrontational, I'm just curious, how is it any cheaper than 90% of the logia class fruits? This has all the same weaknesses, and technically a few more, since I can't just let things like poison or nets pass through me... | |
|
| |
Layman Iconoclast Admin
Posts : 10667 Join date : 2008-07-01 Age : 32 Location : I am everywhere I see everything
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:36 pm | |
| we usualy limit longia so they can not become thier eliment just produce and manipulate it | |
|
| |
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:38 pm | |
| Well sorry for the trouble ^.^. | |
|
| |
Layman Iconoclast Admin
Posts : 10667 Join date : 2008-07-01 Age : 32 Location : I am everywhere I see everything
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:39 pm | |
| this would normaly be paramecia since they cant produce it anyway.... | |
|
| |
devonimp
Posts : 11 Join date : 2009-02-02
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:09 pm | |
| Well I can understand the limitation, even if I'm not wholly happy about it ^.^. Perhaps a change would be fine then. Perhaps one or more of the following?
(1) The user can be cut by blades. (2) The user is still hurt by really heavy or hard impacts, the fruit simply dampens it. (ie A normal punch does nothing, a bullet or a cannonball will break the skin or break bones if the user isn't careful.) (3) Instead of having to absorb impact to use it, the user can simply generate impact, and is therefore otherwise vulnerable as a normal person, unless they have the reflexes to use impact to deflect the blow of course.
I am interested in trying a specific character concept, and so I am eager to try a OP RP. Would this fit more in line with your regulations? | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Pakuto pakuto no mi | |
| |
|
| |
| Pakuto pakuto no mi | |
|